TM Forum Autonomous Networks — IG1252 · IAADE · IG1339
Assess, plan, and prepare your journey toward autonomous networks
ANN industrializes maturity assessment, strategic roadmapping, and ANLAV certification preparation, on the best-documented TM Forum scenarios on the market — with governed AI that assists without ever deciding alone.
No commitment, no sales call required
A maturity journey that's hard to tool
Progressing toward network autonomy under TM Forum frameworks means assessing each High Value Scenario (HVS) on a precise maturity scale, gathering scattered technical and declarative evidence, then tracking that progress over time. Without dedicated tooling, this assessment stays manual, evidence scatters across spreadsheets and email threads, and nothing keeps track of what was actually measured rather than merely claimed.
Three pillars, one continuous cycle
ANN is not the TM Forum and does not deliver official ANLAV certification. The tool prepares the evidence pack; the TM Forum validates the self-assessment and issues the certificate.
Understand the assessment
- AN LevelsThe six TM Forum Autonomous Network Levels, from manual operations (L0) to full autonomy (L5), what Level 4 requires and how it is measured.
- ANLETANLET is TM Forum's scenario-based questionnaire for evaluating autonomous network levels.
- FAQAnswers about ANN: what it measures, how the free trial works, where evaluation data is hosted, and how ANN relates to TM Forum ANLAV certification.
Real coverage, not a promise
8
8 active TM Forum High Value Scenarios, out of 23 catalogued
IG1252
TM Forum scoring methodology (Lbase/Lextra/Lscenario), consistent with the published reference example
L0–L5
IAADE maturity scale (Intent/Awareness/Analysis/Decision/Execution), explicit criteria at every level
Every activated scenario carries the trace of its source — a real ANLAV report or a reconstruction documented by CEVIA — never presented as an official TM Forum table if it isn't one.
What sets ANN apart
Reusable scenarios
Adding a scenario is a configuration, never a line of code — the assessment engine stays generic across the whole catalogue.
Governed AI, never the decision-maker
An AI suggestion carries its own label and never counts toward a score until a person has explicitly validated it.
Traceability: evidence → gap → action
Every roadmap gap traces back to the task and the evidence that produced it, from the questionnaire all the way to the exported report.
Technology independence
Hosted and operated by CEVIA, with no dependency on an imposed cloud provider — sovereignty over a client's assessment data.
Three building blocks, one trajectory
On request
On request
On request
Built for every role
Business contributor
Every maturity level carries an explicit criterion: you score a task on facts, never on a gut feeling.
Client administrator
Your organization's data stays isolated, with two-level control. No consultant ever sees another client's data.
Auditor / reader
Declarative and technical evidence are typed and weighted differently: you always know what was actually measured.
Consultant
Access several client engagements in parallel, without weakening the isolation between them.
See ANN on your own trajectory
A demo takes about thirty minutes, on a scenario of your choice among those already tooled.